Update on the CAA Airspace Change Project
From the outset, RSP has stated that the CAP 1616 process used by the CAA to manage proposed changes to airspace is robust and challenging; this provides both aviation and non-aviation stakeholders with assurance that our proposals will be carefully scrutinised by an...Payment of compensation to RSP, by the Department for Transport, for use of the Manston site
RSP wishes to confirm the details of a recent Freedom of Information Act disclosure to the BBC. The Department for Transport has agreed to pay RSP compensation for the use of the Manston site as a post Brexit customs clearance post for the first six months of this...Consent order, agreed by all parties, allows Secretary of State to set out more reasons for his DCO decision
In the High Court today (15 February 2021) Mr Justice Holgate approved a court order which had been agreed by all the parties to the Manston judicial review in December last year. The order allows the judicial review on the ground that the Secretary of State for...Remembering Lorraine Barker
RiverOak Strategic Partners RiverOak Strategic Partners Home About Us Reopening Manston Our Teams Professional Team Strategic Team Airspace Procedures News Community Mythbusting Contact Us Remembering Lorraine BarkerPublished on 24th December, 2020 It is with...DfT decision not to contest the Judicial Review – what does it mean?
Naturally the Department for Transport’s decision not to contest the Judicial Review is disappointing, although it may in fact save time. It is a feature of the DCO process that, in order for more information to be provided by the Secretary of State on the reasons for his decision, the decision must be re-taken, and so the project is effectively back to the final decision stage.